CVE-2025-65495
Integer · Integer Multiple Products
A high-severity vulnerability exists in multiple Integer products due to an integer signedness error within the TLS certificate verification function.
Executive summary
A high-severity vulnerability exists in multiple Integer products due to an integer signedness error within the TLS certificate verification function. This flaw could allow a remote attacker to bypass security checks, potentially leading to a man-in-the-middle attack where sensitive encrypted communications are intercepted and decrypted. Organizations are urged to apply security updates immediately to prevent potential data breaches.
Vulnerability
The vulnerability is an integer signedness error in the tls_verify_call_back() function, which is responsible for validating TLS certificates during a secure connection handshake. An attacker can craft a malicious certificate or manipulate the TLS handshake in a way that provides a specific numeric value to this function. Due to the signedness error, this value is misinterpreted by the application, causing the validation function to incorrectly return a success code when it should have failed, thereby accepting an invalid or malicious certificate. Successful exploitation allows an unauthenticated, remote attacker to impersonate a trusted server, enabling man-in-the-middle (MitM) attacks to decrypt, read, and modify otherwise secure network traffic.
Business impact
This vulnerability is rated as High severity with a CVSS score of 7.5. Successful exploitation could lead to a complete compromise of data confidentiality and integrity for traffic passing through affected systems. An attacker could intercept sensitive information such as user credentials, financial data, personal identifiable information (PII), and proprietary company secrets. The business risks include significant data breaches, regulatory fines, financial loss from fraud, and severe reputational damage from the loss of customer trust.
Remediation
Immediate Action: The primary remediation is to apply the security updates provided by the vendor to all affected products immediately. Prioritize patching on internet-facing systems and critical internal services that rely on TLS for secure communication. After patching, monitor systems for any signs of compromise that may have occurred prior to the update and review relevant access and security logs for anomalous activity.
Proactive Monitoring: Implement enhanced monitoring on affected systems. Security teams should look for anomalies in TLS handshake patterns, unexpected certificate validation errors or successes in application logs, and connections using unusual or self-signed certificates. Network Intrusion Detection/Prevention Systems (IDS/IPS) should be updated with signatures for this vulnerability as they become available to detect and block exploitation attempts.
Compensating Controls: If immediate patching is not feasible, implement the following compensating controls to reduce risk:
- Place affected systems behind a Web Application Firewall (WAF) or a network security appliance that performs independent, deep-packet TLS inspection and validation.
- Implement stricter network segmentation to limit the lateral movement of an attacker should a system be compromised.
- Enforce certificate pinning where application architecture allows, to ensure that clients only connect to servers presenting a specific, pre-approved certificate.
Exploitation status
Public Exploit Available: false
Analyst recommendation
This vulnerability represents a critical risk to the confidentiality and integrity of an organization's data. Given the high severity score and the potential for man-in-the-middle attacks, we strongly recommend that organizations treat this as a high-priority issue. Although CVE-2025-65495 is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog, its impact warrants immediate remediation. All organizations using affected Integer products should follow the vendor's guidance and apply the necessary security updates without delay. If patching is not immediately possible, the compensating controls listed above should be implemented as a temporary mitigation while a patching plan is executed.