CVE-2026-18163

9.8

IBM · Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift

IBM Financial Transaction Manager for RedHat OpenShift contains a deserialization vulnerability that allows remote, unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary code on the target system.

Executive summary

A critical remote code execution vulnerability in IBM Financial Transaction Manager for RedHat OpenShift poses a severe risk to transactional data integrity and system availability.

Vulnerability

The application is susceptible to improper deserialization of untrusted data (CWE-502). This flaw allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to execute arbitrary code within the context of the application.

Business impact

The vulnerability carries a CVSS score of 9.8, indicating a critical severity level. Successful exploitation grants an attacker full control over the application, potentially leading to unauthorized financial transaction manipulation, theft of sensitive customer data, and complete compromise of the underlying OpenShift environment.

Remediation

Immediate Action: Update IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift to version 4.0.11.0 or later as specified in the vendor security advisory.

Proactive Monitoring: Review application logs for suspicious serialized objects or unexpected process execution patterns that deviate from established baseline behaviors.

Compensating Controls: Implement strict network segmentation and utilize a Web Application Firewall (WAF) to inspect incoming traffic for malicious payloads associated with deserialization attacks.

Exploitation status

Public Exploit Available: Unknown

Analyst recommendation

Due to the critical nature of this remote code execution vulnerability and the lack of required authentication, immediate patching is mandatory. Organizations running affected versions of IBM FTM should prioritize the deployment of the 4.0.11.0 update to prevent potential system compromise and data loss.

More IBM CVEs all →

History

  1. Disclosed CVE record published
  2. Collected by CVE Brief via github
  3. Analyst report written
  4. Published in the daily brief critical section

Sources