CVE-2026-20307

9.9

Cisco · Identity Services Engine Software

Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) is vulnerable to remote command execution via insecure Java deserialization, allowing authenticated attackers to achieve root-level system access.

Executive summary

A critical vulnerability in Cisco Identity Services Engine allows authenticated, low-privileged attackers to execute arbitrary code as root, posing a severe threat to network infrastructure security.

Vulnerability

The flaw is an insecure deserialization vulnerability (CWE-502) in the web-based management interface. An attacker with low-privileged administrative credentials can send a crafted Java byte stream to execute arbitrary commands on the host operating system.

Business impact

Successful exploitation grants an attacker full root-level control over the Cisco ISE appliance, which is the cornerstone of network access control. Given the CVSS score of 9.9, the risk is extreme: attackers could intercept network traffic, disable security policies, or cause a denial of service that prevents all endpoints from accessing the network.

Remediation

Immediate Action: Review the official Cisco security advisory (cisco-sa-ise-rce-se7bYU57) and apply the vendor-provided patches or upgrades as soon as they become available.

Proactive Monitoring: Monitor management interface access logs for unusual traffic patterns or unexpected serialized object streams.

Compensating Controls: Implement strict access control lists (ACLs) to limit management interface access to known, trusted administrative workstations only.

Exploitation status

Public Exploit Available: No

Analyst recommendation

Due to the critical nature of this vulnerability and the potential for complete system compromise, IT teams should prioritize restricting access to the Cisco ISE management interface immediately. Administrators must prepare to deploy vendor-supplied updates as a top priority to neutralize the risk of unauthorized root-level command execution.

More Cisco CVEs all →

History

  1. Disclosed CVE record published
  2. Collected by CVE Brief via github
  3. Analyst report written
  4. Published in the daily brief critical section

Sources