CVE-2026-33963

7.5

Samsung · Exynos Mobile Processor

A stack-based buffer overflow in the Samsung Exynos mobile processor camera driver allows a local attacker to cause a denial of service via a malformed message.

Executive summary

A high-severity stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in Samsung Exynos processor firmware could allow local attackers to disrupt camera services and potentially achieve unauthorized system impact.

Vulnerability

The vulnerability is a stack-based buffer overflow (CWE-121) triggered by sending a malformed message to the camera driver. The attack requires local access with low privileges (PR:L) and high complexity (AC:H) to execute successfully.

Business impact

Successful exploitation leads to a denial of service, which can render mobile device camera functionality unavailable or potentially lead to broader system instability. With a CVSS score of 7.5, this high-severity flaw poses a risk to device integrity and operational continuity for users relying on Samsung hardware in sensitive or enterprise environments.

Remediation

Immediate Action: Identify devices running the affected Exynos chipsets and apply the latest firmware security updates provided by the device manufacturer as soon as they become available.

Proactive Monitoring: Monitor system logs for repeated camera driver crashes or unusual error messages originating from hardware-level processes.

Compensating Controls: Ensure that device access is restricted to authorized users and enforce strict application sandboxing to prevent unauthorized local processes from interacting with low-level drivers.

Exploitation status

Public Exploit Available: No

Analyst recommendation

Given the potential for service disruption, administrators should prioritize firmware updates for all Samsung devices utilizing the listed Exynos processors. Verify the patch status through the official Samsung Semiconductor security portal to ensure complete coverage against this vulnerability.

More Samsung CVEs all →

History

  1. Disclosed CVE record published
  2. Collected by CVE Brief via github
  3. Analyst report written
  4. Published in the daily brief high section

Sources