CVE-2026-43691

7.8

Apple · macOS

A path handling vulnerability in Apple macOS allows a local application to escalate privileges to root through improved validation requirements.

Executive summary

An Apple macOS path handling vulnerability allows a local attacker to gain full root privileges, posing a significant risk to system security.

Vulnerability

This vulnerability involves a path handling flaw that permits a locally authenticated user (running an application) to bypass security controls and achieve root-level code execution. The issue stems from insufficient input validation during path resolution.

Business impact

Successful exploitation allows an attacker to gain root access, which grants complete control over the affected device. This level of compromise can lead to the total loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability of system data. With a CVSS score of 7.8, this vulnerability represents a high-severity risk that could facilitate persistent malware installation and unauthorized access to sensitive corporate information.

Remediation

Immediate Action: Update all affected macOS systems to the specified fixed versions (15.8, 26.7, or 27) immediately to resolve the path validation flaw.

Proactive Monitoring: Review system audit logs for signs of unauthorized privilege escalation or suspicious process execution by low-privileged applications.

Compensating Controls: Implement strict application control policies (e.g., allow-listing) to limit the execution of untrusted or unauthorized binaries that could leverage this privilege escalation path.

Exploitation status

Public Exploit Available: No

Analyst recommendation

Given the capability for an attacker to gain root privileges, organizations must prioritize the deployment of the provided security updates. Patching is the only effective way to neutralize this flaw, and administrators should ensure all managed devices are updated to the latest versions of macOS to prevent local privilege escalation.

More Apple CVEs all →

History

  1. Disclosed CVE record published
  2. Collected by CVE Brief via github
  3. Analyst report written
  4. Published in the daily brief high section

Sources