CVE-2026-61714

7.8

FluidSynth · fluidsynth

A heap-based buffer overflow in FluidSynth allows out-of-bounds memory access when the synth.midi-channels configuration is set above 16, potentially leading to system compromise.

Executive summary

A heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability in FluidSynth version 2.2.4 through 2.5.5 permits out-of-bounds memory access, posing a severe risk to system integrity and confidentiality.

Vulnerability

The software suffers from heap-based buffer overflow, out-of-bounds read, and out-of-bounds write conditions triggered when the synth.midi-channels configuration exceeds 16. This flaw allows an unauthenticated user or local process to cause undefined behavior that may result in arbitrary code execution or service disruption.

Business impact

The vulnerability carries a CVSS score of 7.8, indicating a high level of risk. Successful exploitation could lead to unauthorized data access, the modification of critical system files, or a complete denial of service for the synthesizer application, potentially disrupting production workflows that rely on this software.

Remediation

Immediate Action: Update the FluidSynth software to version 2.5.6 or later to resolve the heap allocation vulnerability.

Proactive Monitoring: Monitor system logs for unexpected application crashes or memory access violations that may indicate exploitation attempts.

Compensating Controls: If an immediate update is not feasible, ensure the synth.midi-channels configuration is strictly set to its default value of 16 to avoid the vulnerable code path.

Exploitation status

Public Exploit Available: No

Analyst recommendation

Given the severity of potential memory corruption, organizations utilizing FluidSynth should prioritize upgrading to version 2.5.6. Implementing the recommended configuration restriction to 16 channels serves as a critical immediate mitigation for environments unable to perform an immediate software update.

More FluidSynth CVEs

History

  1. Disclosed CVE record published
  2. Collected by CVE Brief via github
  3. Analyst report written
  4. Published in the daily brief high section

Sources