CVE-2026-81204
9.8IBM · Langflow OSS
IBM Langflow OSS contains a code injection vulnerability during graph construction that allows unauthenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on the underlying system.
Executive summary
A critical remote code execution vulnerability in IBM Langflow OSS poses an immediate threat to system integrity and requires urgent patching.
Vulnerability
This flaw is caused by improper control of code generation (CWE-94) during the graph construction process. An unauthenticated attacker can exploit this via a network-based vector to execute arbitrary commands with the privileges of the application process.
Business impact
The severity of this vulnerability is critical, reflected by a CVSS score of 9.8. Successful exploitation allows a remote attacker to gain full control over the host system, leading to complete data compromise, unauthorized access to sensitive environments, and potential lateral movement within the network. This represents a significant risk to organizational confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
Remediation
Immediate Action: Upgrade IBM Langflow OSS to version 1.11.6 immediately as specified in the vendor advisory.
Proactive Monitoring: Review application and system logs for unusual process execution patterns or unexpected network traffic originating from the Langflow service.
Compensating Controls: Deploy a Web Application Firewall (WAF) with rules configured to inspect and block malicious payloads directed at graph construction endpoints until the update is deployed.
Exploitation status
Public Exploit Available: Unknown
Analyst recommendation
Given the critical nature of this remote code execution vulnerability and the lack of authentication required for exploitation, organizations must prioritize this update above standard maintenance tasks. Please verify the integrity of the updated environment immediately following the deployment of version 1.11.6 to ensure the patch was applied correctly and the service remains stable.
More IBM CVEs all →
History
- Disclosed CVE record published
- Collected by CVE Brief via github
- Analyst report written
- Published in the daily brief critical section