CVE-2026-81657

9.8

IBM · Guardium Data Protection

IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 contains a deserialization vulnerability that allows remote, unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary code on the affected system.

Executive summary

A critical remote code execution vulnerability in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 allows unauthenticated attackers to gain full control over the system.

Vulnerability

The application is susceptible to a deserialization of untrusted data flaw (CWE-502), which can be triggered by a remote, unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code.

Business impact

The ability for an unauthenticated attacker to achieve remote code execution represents the highest level of security risk. With a CVSS score of 9.8, this flaw could lead to a complete system compromise, unauthorized access to sensitive database audit logs, data exfiltration, or the total loss of system availability.

Remediation

Immediate Action: Update IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 to the provided fix pack (SqlGuard_12.0p233_FixPack) available via the IBM Fix Central portal.

Proactive Monitoring: Monitor system logs for unusual process execution patterns or unexpected network traffic originating from untrusted sources directed at the Guardium management interfaces.

Compensating Controls: Implement strict network access control lists to restrict traffic to the Guardium management interface to known, trusted administrative IP addresses until the patch can be applied.

Exploitation status

Public Exploit Available: No

Analyst recommendation

Given the critical severity and the potential for full system compromise, organizations running IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 must prioritize the application of the specified fix pack immediately. Failure to address this vulnerability exposes the core security infrastructure of the database environment to unauthenticated remote attackers.

More IBM CVEs all →

History

  1. Disclosed CVE record published
  2. Collected by CVE Brief via github
  3. Analyst report written
  4. Published in the daily brief critical section

Sources