CVE-2026-82762
8.8Contec · FX series (FXA5000, FXA5020, FXE5000, FXS5000)
A command injection vulnerability in Contec FX series industrial devices allows authenticated attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands.
Executive summary
A critical OS command injection vulnerability in Contec FX series devices allows authenticated remote attackers to achieve full system compromise.
Vulnerability
The vulnerability is an OS command injection flaw (CWE-78) triggered by improper neutralization of special elements in system commands. An attacker with valid credentials can leverage this flaw to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system.
Business impact
The ability to execute arbitrary OS commands on industrial networking hardware poses a significant risk to operational integrity. A successful exploit could lead to full device takeover, enabling lateral movement within the production network or the disruption of critical industrial processes. Given the CVSS score of 8.8, this vulnerability is classified as high severity and requires immediate attention to prevent unauthorized system access.
Remediation
Immediate Action: Update affected Contec FX series devices to firmware version 1.12.00 or later as specified in the official vendor security advisory.
Proactive Monitoring: Monitor system logs for unusual command execution patterns or unauthorized changes to administrative settings.
Compensating Controls: Restrict management interface access to trusted administrative IP addresses and ensure that all device credentials are changed from default values.
Exploitation status
Public Exploit Available: Unknown
Analyst recommendation
Organizations utilizing affected Contec hardware must prioritize the application of the 1.12.00 firmware update. Because this vulnerability allows for arbitrary command execution, the risk of total system compromise is high. Security teams should ensure that all devices are patched and that administrative access is restricted to minimize the attack surface.
More Contec CVEs all →
History
- Disclosed CVE record published
- Collected by CVE Brief via github
- Analyst report written
- Published in the daily brief high section