CVE-2026-83603

8.4

Netdata · Netdata

A vulnerability in the Netdata ndsudo helper allows a low-privileged service account to execute arbitrary code as root via a malicious UNIX socket and insecure deserialization.

Executive summary

A high-severity deserialization vulnerability in Netdata allows local attackers to escalate privileges to root, posing a significant risk to host system integrity.

Vulnerability

The vulnerability exists in the ndsudo helper command, which allows a low-privileged netdata service account to supply a controlled socket path. This leads to the execution of attacker-supplied data via the pickle module, resulting in arbitrary code execution with root privileges on systems where fail2ban-client is installed.

Business impact

Successful exploitation grants an attacker full root-level control over the host system. Given the CVSS score of 8.4, this vulnerability represents a severe threat to infrastructure security, potentially leading to total system compromise, data theft, and persistence mechanisms that are difficult to detect.

Remediation

Immediate Action: Update Netdata to version 2.10.4 or later immediately to resolve the insecure handling of the socket path.

Proactive Monitoring: Review system logs for unexpected activity originating from the netdata user account or suspicious invocations of fail2ban-client.

Compensating Controls: If immediate patching is not possible, restrict the netdata user account permissions and audit the system for the presence of the fail2ban-client component.

Exploitation status

Public Exploit Available: No (exploit_available: false)

Analyst recommendation

This vulnerability presents a critical risk to any environment running Netdata with fail2ban-client installed. Security teams must prioritize the upgrade to version 2.10.4 to eliminate the escalation vector. Failure to remediate allows any compromised low-privileged process within the Netdata environment to achieve full administrative control over the underlying host.

History

  1. Disclosed CVE record published
  2. Collected by CVE Brief via github
  3. Analyst report written
  4. Published in the daily brief high section

Sources