CVE-2026-97413

9.8

Linux · Kernel

An integer underflow in the Linux kernel RDMA server allows unauthenticated remote attackers to trigger out-of-bounds memory access via malicious network messages.

Executive summary

A critical vulnerability in the Linux kernel RDMA subsystem allows unauthenticated remote attackers to achieve arbitrary memory access, potentially leading to system compromise.

Vulnerability

The vulnerability exists due to a failure to validate the length of network-supplied messages in the RDMA/rtrs-srv component. An unauthenticated attacker can provide a crafted value that triggers an integer underflow, resulting in an out-of-bounds memory access during callback operations.

Business impact

This flaw carries a CVSS score of 9.8, reflecting its critical severity due to the potential for remote code execution and full system compromise. Successful exploitation could lead to unauthorized data access, complete loss of system integrity, and significant operational downtime for affected infrastructure.

Remediation

Immediate Action: Update the Linux kernel to version 6.12.111, 6.18.53, or a later stable release to incorporate the necessary validation logic.

Proactive Monitoring: Monitor system logs for kernel-level crashes or unusual memory management errors that may indicate exploitation attempts targeting the RDMA subsystem.

Compensating Controls: Restrict network access to the RDMA service to trusted internal segments only, as the vulnerability is remotely exploitable.

Exploitation status

Public Exploit Available: Unknown

Analyst recommendation

Given the critical nature of this kernel-level memory corruption vulnerability, immediate patching is required to prevent potential remote exploitation. Organizations running RDMA services on Linux should prioritize testing and deploying the provided security updates across all affected environments to eliminate the risk of unauthorized system access.

More Linux CVEs all →

History

  1. Disclosed CVE record published
  2. Collected by CVE Brief via github
  3. Analyst report written
  4. Published in the daily brief critical section

Sources