CVE-2026-11727

8.1

IBM · MQ for HPE NonStop

A heap-based buffer overflow in the IBM MQ C client for HPE NonStop allows remote attackers to trigger a denial of service or execute arbitrary code via malicious queue manager responses.

Executive summary

A critical heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability in the IBM MQ C client for HPE NonStop could allow unauthenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or crash affected systems.

Vulnerability

This vulnerability is a heap-based buffer overflow (CWE-122) occurring when the MQ C client improperly validates responses from a queue manager during AMS policy data retrieval. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this flaw by sending a crafted response to the client.

Business impact

The potential for arbitrary code execution poses a severe risk to organizational data integrity and system confidentiality. Given the CVSS score of 8.1, this high-severity vulnerability could lead to total system compromise, resulting in significant operational downtime and the potential for unauthorized data access if exploited successfully.

Remediation

Immediate Action: Upgrade to IBM MQ for HPE NonStop version 8.1.0.41 (CSU 8.1.0.41) as recommended by the vendor.

Proactive Monitoring: Review system and application logs for unusual crashes or unexpected process terminations related to the MQ C client.

Compensating Controls: Implement network segmentation to restrict communication between MQ clients and untrusted queue managers, and utilize intrusion detection systems to monitor for anomalous traffic patterns.

Exploitation status

Public Exploit Available: No

Analyst recommendation

Due to the potential for arbitrary code execution and the high CVSS severity rating, this vulnerability presents a significant risk to the integrity of the IBM MQ environment. Administrators should prioritize the deployment of the 8.1.0.41 update across all affected HPE NonStop systems immediately to ensure the buffer overflow condition is remediated.

More IBM CVEs all →

History

  1. Disclosed CVE record published
  2. Collected by CVE Brief via github
  3. Analyst report written
  4. Published in the daily brief high section

Sources