CVE-2026-84108

8.1

IBM · Guardium Data Protection

IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to remote arbitrary code execution via improper neutralization of input during web page generation.

Executive summary

A critical vulnerability in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 allows remote unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary code, posing a severe risk to system integrity and data confidentiality.

Vulnerability

The software fails to properly neutralize user input during web page generation, leading to an improper input validation flaw. This vulnerability is remotely exploitable by an unauthenticated attacker, potentially resulting in full system compromise.

Business impact

The ability for a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code on a data security platform like IBM Guardium represents a significant risk to organizational data. Given the CVSS score of 8.1, this vulnerability is classified as high severity, as it can lead to complete unauthorized control over the affected appliance and the sensitive data it manages.

Remediation

Immediate Action: Apply the vendor-provided patch pack SqlGuard_12.0p233_FixPack available via the IBM Fix Central portal immediately.

Proactive Monitoring: Monitor system logs for unauthorized web requests or unexpected processes executing within the context of the web application server.

Compensating Controls: Deploy or update Web Application Firewall (WAF) rules to inspect and block malicious input strings targeting web page generation parameters until the patch is applied.

Exploitation status

Public Exploit Available: Unknown

Analyst recommendation

Given the potential for remote code execution and the sensitive nature of the IBM Guardium platform, this vulnerability should be prioritized for immediate remediation. Administrators must verify the version in use and apply the recommended fix pack without delay to prevent potential exploitation of this high-risk flaw.

More IBM CVEs all →

History

  1. Disclosed CVE record published
  2. Collected by CVE Brief via github
  3. Analyst report written
  4. Published in the daily brief high section

Sources