CVE-2026-12647

9.9

Ivanti · Neurons for ITSM

A missing authorization vulnerability in Ivanti Neurons for ITSM allows a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code on the underlying server.

Executive summary

An authenticated remote code execution vulnerability in Ivanti Neurons for ITSM poses a critical risk to organizational infrastructure and data integrity.

Vulnerability

This vulnerability involves a missing authorization flaw, categorized as CWE-862, which allows a remote user with authenticated access to bypass intended security controls and execute arbitrary code on the server.

Business impact

The ability for an authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code represents a total compromise of the affected system, potentially leading to unauthorized data access, lateral movement within the network, and complete loss of service availability. Given the CVSS score of 9.9, this vulnerability is classified as critical, necessitating immediate attention to prevent severe operational disruption and potential exfiltration of sensitive ITSM data.

Remediation

Immediate Action: Upgrade Ivanti Neurons for ITSM to version 2026.2 or later as specified by the vendor security advisory.

Proactive Monitoring: Review server access logs for anomalous command execution patterns or unexpected administrative activity originating from standard user accounts.

Compensating Controls: Implement strict network segmentation and restrict access to the ITSM management interface to trusted administrative subnets until the patch is successfully deployed.

Exploitation status

Public Exploit Available: No (exploit_available: false).

Analyst recommendation

The severity of this flaw cannot be overstated, as it provides a direct path for attackers to gain full control over the Ivanti Neurons for ITSM environment. IT administrators must prioritize the update to version 2026.2 immediately to neutralize this threat and ensure the continued security of the platform.

More Ivanti CVEs all →

History

  1. Disclosed CVE record published
  2. Collected by CVE Brief via github
  3. Analyst report written
  4. Published in the daily brief critical section

Sources