CVE-2026-78569

8.8

IBM · Langflow OSS

IBM Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 through 1.11.5 contain an OS command injection vulnerability due to an incomplete denylist in the security scanner, allowing remote code execution for authenticated users.

Executive summary

An authenticated remote code execution vulnerability in IBM Langflow OSS enables attackers with existing access to execute arbitrary system commands, posing a significant risk to system integrity.

Vulnerability

The application is susceptible to OS command injection (CWE-78) because the security scanner employs an insufficient denylist. This flaw allows an authenticated attacker to bypass intended restrictions and execute arbitrary code on the underlying host.

Business impact

This vulnerability carries a CVSS score of 8.8, reflecting its high impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. Successful exploitation grants an attacker the ability to run arbitrary code, potentially leading to full system compromise, exfiltration of sensitive data, or lateral movement within the network infrastructure.

Remediation

Immediate Action: Upgrade IBM Langflow OSS to version 1.11.6 immediately as specified in the official vendor guidance.

Proactive Monitoring: Review system and application logs for suspicious command execution patterns or unexpected child processes originating from the Langflow service.

Compensating Controls: Implement strict network segmentation and ensure the application runs with the minimum necessary privileges to limit the blast radius of a potential command injection event.

Exploitation status

Public Exploit Available: Unknown

Analyst recommendation

Given the severity of this remote code execution flaw, organizations must prioritize the transition to version 1.11.6. Administrators should verify the current installation version and apply the patch during the next available maintenance window to neutralize the risk of unauthorized command execution.

More IBM CVEs all →

History

  1. Disclosed CVE record published
  2. Collected by CVE Brief via github
  3. Analyst report written
  4. Published in the daily brief high section

Sources