CVE-2026-84076
7.6IBM · Guardium Data Protection
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 contains an improper authorization vulnerability that allows a remote authenticated attacker to bypass security restrictions.
Executive summary
A remote authenticated attacker can exploit an authorization flaw in IBM Guardium Data Protection version 12.2 to bypass security controls and potentially modify sensitive data.
Vulnerability
The application suffers from improper authorization (CWE-285), which occurs when a system does not correctly verify the permissions of an authenticated user. This allows a user with lower privileges to perform actions that should be restricted, specifically impacting integrity.
Business impact
The vulnerability carries a CVSS score of 7.6, which classifies it as a high-severity risk. Since Guardium is used for database security and activity monitoring, an unauthorized authorization bypass could lead to the modification of audit logs or security configurations, potentially allowing an attacker to hide malicious database activity or escalate their control over the data environment.
Remediation
Immediate Action: Upgrade to the provided fix pack, SqlGuard_12.0p233_FixPack, as directed by the official IBM support advisory.
Proactive Monitoring: Review administrative access logs for unauthorized configuration changes or unexpected modifications to data protection policies.
Compensating Controls: Implement strict role-based access control (RBAC) and limit access to the Guardium management interface to trusted administrative networks until the patch is applied.
Exploitation status
Public Exploit Available: No
Analyst recommendation
Given the critical role of IBM Guardium in maintaining database security, this vulnerability presents a significant risk to data integrity. Administrators should prioritize the deployment of the specified fix pack during the next maintenance window to ensure that authorization controls are correctly enforced and to prevent potential security bypasses by authenticated users.
More IBM CVEs all →
History
- Disclosed CVE record published
- Collected by CVE Brief via github
- Analyst report written
- Published in the daily brief high section